(Hello lovelies! I'm here linking up with The Grim Writer for her Remember, O Thou Man Lenten Blog Party!)
Humans, I think, never quite get past the
not-having-object permanence stage. I mean, obviously we do—babies develop object
permanence (knowing that something still exists even when it’s hidden) at
around 6-8 months old, apparently. I know that there is lunch waiting for me in
my backpack even if I can’t see the lunch or even the backpack—and I’m hungry
right now, so I’m thinking about that lunch in my backpack quite a bit at the
moment.
But one of the things I’ve observed about
myself over the last few years of being a college student and toggling back and
forth across the United States is that my brain tends to place the most importance
on what is right in front of me. It’s not that I don’t know that, say,
my friends at school still exist while I’m at home, or that my home parish
still exists when I’m at school. I do know that. But it’s a matter of
priorities.
When I’m at home, things that are going on
at home and at my home parish seem super important and lead me to make different
decisions about the future than I do when I’m at school, at which point the
things going on at Newman seem super important. At home, the demands of, say,
my job at my home parish seem different than they do when I’m at college. I’m
much more likely to, say, decide to stay longer at home in the summer in order
to do just one more wedding or to go to a family event. When I’m at
college, the demands of my friendships seem a lot more pressing than they do
when I’m at home. I’m much more likely to, say, decide not to go home for
spring break and instead go to Tennessee. (Both of those things are things that
I have done, and in the grand scheme of things, I regret neither. But I’m
interested in observing my decision-making process there.)
In some ways, this is healthy. If, when I
was at college, I obsessed over home, my family, my home parish, and everyone
that I know back at home, I wouldn’t ever have time to even do my homework, let
alone cultivate friendships at Newman. If, when I was at home, I obsessed over Newman
and was constantly on the phone with my friends there (all of them), my family would
feel alienated and ignored.
It’s a balance.
And it is important to love the person in
front of you. Who is my neighbour? It is the one who is in need when I am
walking along the way, and find him beat up in a ditch, not the one who is 2000
miles away who I can’t do anything for. (Although, admittedly, there are many
things you can do for someone who is 2000 miles away in this digital age, but
you, I expect, know what I mean.)
But of course, the challenge of that is to not
focus on what is in front of me to the detriment of every other part of my
life. Because one of the things about my life right now is that it is by
nature bifurcated. (Or currently, trifurcated. I don’t know if that’s a word.) But
I am called to have an integrated life, and to be the same person throughout my
life. To bring my life into a unity no matter where I am. So, if I’m viewing
the world through my home-Newman bifocals, I can’t just look through one half
of the glasses, which is the temptation of the priority shift that comes from
dealing with what is right in front of you.
When I’m home, I can’t just not talk to my
Newman friends for a month because I’m “focusing on my family”. While I’m here
in England, I can’t just not do my remote volunteer job at Newman because it’s
not as high on the list of things-my-brain-is-spending-a-lot-of-time-on. While
I’m at Newman, I can’t just not talk to my family, or my friends back at home.
That’s not healthy either.
Also, knowing this about myself, I have to
be cognizant about the decisions that I’m making, especially if they’ll affect
future-Sam-who-is-at-home (if I’m making them at Newman) or future-Sam-who-is-at-Newman
(if I’m making them at home). Or both, if I’m making them from England. And
that’s hard. That is really hard. It’s so easy to think that the
priorities that I have at the moment are just my priorities and not
recognize that priorities change based on who is right in front of me.
For instance, I've observed to myself that where I end up living after college may very well be more of a product of where I am (at home, or at college) when I make that decision, than of a fully logical thought process. That's not something I necessarily want to happen, but in order for it not to, I will need to put a lot of thought and prayer into the decision--possibly more than I think I need.
As that observation implies, sometimes, I slip up and don’t have the
priorities balanced. Maybe I spend too much time on the phone with a friend;
maybe I hop away from family dinner at home to text a friend. Maybe I go home a
little too soon in December and miss something that’s important to one of my
friends. It happens. And there’s nothing you can do but learn from it, pick
yourself up, apologize, and keep going, as is the case for many things in life.
At this point you may be wondering “Sam, I
will admit that this is an interesting reflection but what the heck does
this have to do with Lent?”
Excellent question, my dear reader. Please
allow me to explain.
If it’s the people and things that are in
front of me the most that are my highest priorities at whatever stage I’m at—my
friends & roles at Newman are my highest priority when I’m there, my family
and friends at home are my highest priority when I’m there—then what does that
mean for my ultimate priority?
Which is, obviously, (or at least it should
be, even if it isn’t always) getting to heaven.
I.e. loving God with all of my heart, soul,
mind, and strength.
The fact that humans, even adult humans,
have a hard time with object permanence means, as I’ve realized when thinking
this over in the past couple of weeks, that it’s important to keep the things that
are important to us front and centre in our lives.
Not just metaphorically. Also literally. Ideally, we have those things in front of us visibly. (But also auditorily,
tangibly, and with all of the other sense—I don’t only see my friends and
family, I also touch them and listen to them. But sensibly, is my point. Sense
them.)
If God is going to be our number one
priority, we need to sense Him and have Him in front of us always, so that we
are always seeing (smelling, hearing, smelling, tasting) Him, so that He will
then become our number one priority in life.
And this, my dear darling readers, is where
we have Catholic religious practice to the rescue. In the Catholic Church, we
believe that God has given us sacraments—physical ways in which He touches our
lives. Signs that accomplish what they signify—i.e. baptism symbolizes washing,
but also accomplishes the washing clean of our souls from sin. (Pretty wild,
right? It’s neat.) In the sacraments, we hear Him, see Him, touch Him, taste
Him, and smell Him. (Chrism—it smells SO good!)
But it’s not only enough to say “okay,
well, I sense God on Sundays. I hear Him in the scriptures, I see Him, I touch Him, and I taste Him in the Eucharist.
(And, sometimes, I smell Him, if there's a baptism.)”
That’s great. And it’s a good start. It’s
what God asks of it—at least to sense Him on Sundays, to put Him in
front of ourselves visibly and sensorially so that He will become our priority
at least that much.
But it’s not enough.
And this, my dear darling readers, is where
we have Catholic devotional practice to the rescue.
Daily prayer and daily Mass. It’s important.
If we want God to be in front of us, for getting to Heaven to be our top priority,
it’s not enough to only see God on Sundays. He needs to be in front of us every
single day. And that means, at the very least, daily prayer. If you were
married, would you only want to talk to your spouse once a week? Or a few times
a week? No! You’d want to talk to them every single day. (If you are
married, I’m really hoping you talk to your spouse more than once a week…)
Christ is the Bridegroom and lover of all of our souls. Heaven is the eternal
Wedding Feast of Christ and His Church! As such, we should be talking to God every
single day. Sometimes that means daily Mass. Other times, like for me right
now, that’s not feasible (because of a combination of geography and schedule),
and so it means prayer wherever I am and in whatever I’m doing (ideally—obviously
I’m not always great at this).
Of course, if we’re going to Daily Mass, we’re
sensing God in that way, having Him in front of us that way. But if not (and
honestly, even if so), we need other ways to help us sensibly relate to God on
a daily basis, during our daily prayer. Because we need that daily contact
with Him if we’re going to become saints and get to Heaven.
First of all, there is, of course, the one
and only wonderful practice of reading the Bible (and/or hearing it proclaimed). God’s word, directly into our
brains via our eyes. And honestly, I feel like reading has a bit of an auditory
component to it, too. Am I the only one who hears what I’m reading in my head
as I’m reading it? (It’s a bit of a strange thing—if I’m not concentrating on
that, I don’t notice it, but if I am, I do.)
Second of all, though, Catholic tradition
is chock full of sensible things that we can use in our daily lives to
keep God at the front and centre. They’re called ‘sacramentals’, I believe
because they’re meant to remind us of the sacraments (and possibly be avenues
of grace? The exact definition eludes me).
Things we pray with, like the rosary, chaplets, crucifixes, candles, saint
medals, Catholic art of various kinds, statues, (for some of us) veils, and so
on.
Other things that are meant to draw us close to God as well, like holy water,
and blessed salt.
These things are very often aids to prayer, things that we experience with more
than one sense, and things that help us to keep God in the centre of our senses
at home.
For instance, we hang Catholic art on the
walls just like we’d hang pictures of loved ones—to remind us that we love them,
and that they are priorities in our life! I currently have a bunch of pictures
of family and friends arrayed on my desk in England, and every time I see one
particular friend’s face, I’m like “I should text her!” And then I often do.
Same with images of Jesus, Mary, and the saints. We see them, and we’re more
likely to say a quick ‘hello!’ or be drawn towards prayer.
And this whole thing is like what I said
about balancing priorities earlier—sometimes, we get in wrong. And then we pick
ourselves up, dust ourselves off, go to Confession (if we’re Catholic), and
try again. It’s a little different from my need to balance PNW priorities vs.
Illinois priorities, because God is always supposed to be the first in our
lives—but the principle is the same as with any other priority. If He is front
and centre in your senses, He will hopefully be front and centre in your thoughts,
and if He’s front and centre in your thoughts, He will ideally be front and
centre in your priorities, and in your whole life.
And then, my dear reader, you become a
saint. I’m not there yet, but I hope someday I will be.
What do you think? Do you also have areas where it's hard to balance your priorities because you have different things and people in front of you at different times?
Let me make some of this ruminating easier for you. You'll come back and live here when school is over. There you go! No more angst on that topic. Love you lots, sweet girl. RG
ReplyDeleteHa! I appreciate your input, and we'll see what God has in mind! Love you, too. :)
DeleteThis is a very interesting discussion to me, partially because I have a very not bifurcated life compared to a lot of people my age, but partially because it never occurred to me to even consider it? I’ve realized recently about myself that I’m just…bad about thinking about the correct way to navigate social life. If that makes sense. Like, I think about the virtuous way but that kind of boils down mostly to ‘be good to people.’ And I feel like I’m in the general habit of doing that anyway (mostly. Thank God.) so beyond that I don’t really…analyze stuff like this much? I have never once before this post paused to consider what my social priorities ought to be. If that makes sense. Not because I don’t care, but because I just kind of…y’know….keep rolling, try to do right by people, and only think about the practice rather than the theory. Same goes in some ways for my relationship with Jesus, although I think I’m a good bit better at considering that. But as much as sacramentals and frequent Mass and adoration are a huge part of my life and I consider often their spiritual impact on me I had never stopped to consider the object permanence thing.
ReplyDeleteSo I guess what I’m saying is thanks for this great reflection lol. And for joining in the linkup. ♥️😊 God bless you Sam dear!
Oh, that's very true! I had a vague thought while writing this post about how most people don't have bifurcated lives, but I hadn't really considered that (strongly, at least).
DeleteAnd I don't think it's a bad thing that you don't spend a lot of time thinking about the right way to navigate social life! (I don't spend /that/ much time on it either...unless I'm writing a reflection post like this, lol. Although I think one of my vices is that I am very bad at making an effort to be kind to people who irk me. I don't want to spend any more time with them than I need to; and the best way to get them out of my hair is to be rude to them. So, I should probably think about the virtuous way more often! XD) It also, I think, helps that you don't have the bifurcated life, so you're able to (mostly) just focus on the people in front of you, and it works out in the end. :D
I'm so glad you enjoyed the reflection, Grim dear! God bless you, too!