It is very nearly the end of 2021. That is insane, but then, the end of the year is always insane. 'Tis the way of life.
You may remember that last year, I did a Good, Better, Best post with the new books that I had read in 2020, and I enjoyed that so much (and y'all did, too, or at least, you made a good enough pretense that I thought you did), I thought I'd do it again next year!
Since I read (according to Goodreads) approximately three hundred books this year (including rereads), I am not even going to try to include every book that I read! From this list, I am (obviously) excluding the rereads (of which there were many, yet fewer than I wanted, to be honest) as well as most nonfiction (I make exceptions for certain Lewis and Chesterton books, because Lewis and Chesterton), books that are further along in series, and (again, obviously) books that I did not like all that much! With that said, I think there were a few other omissions, just because I felt like it (like, for some reason I left off Agatha Christie. Don't ask why--I just did. I also left off all but one Georgette Heyer, since they're getting a separate post, next year), so if there's a book that you think should be on here but isn't...that doesn't necessarily mean I hate it. Just that I was feeling capricious. :) This is, after all, meant to be a slice of my reading year, not the whole thing! And if I included all the books I liked, even with excluding nonfiction and rereads, it would be far too long for me to finish in time. As it is, I cut it a bit close.
Also, one, maybe two of the books in "Best" this year are anything other than classic fiction, and maybe this should tell me something about my taste? XD
Good
I am a fan of conniving women who use their knowledge of How High Society Works to manipulate people in a very fae-like manner, while also solving mysteries. Thus, I was a fan of this book. I did get a little bored in the middle--it felt like the author was writing to amuse herself, and not always making it make sense to the reader. But I must admit, it was highly diverting, and so I do not regret it.
I am here for the amount that Quasimodo loves Notre-Dame, and I am not here for the chapters-long descriptions of Paris. I am here for plot twists, but I am not here for Frollo's creepiness. However, I honestly enjoyed this book for the most part, even though it's very different from the movie (which I saw first, oops), and ultimately like it better than the movie--the movie took the characters, changed them, and then added a whole new plot. I protest on principle. But just in case you ever decide to read this one, be prepared--it does not end like you think it will.
I must admit, there are parts of this book that are very blurry in my mind. But the main bit--a man simply doing his job in a very awkward and difficult situation, while also trying not to get killed--has definitely stuck with me. As did that scene at shoot-what-is-the-name-of-that-island-fortress. For some reason, that was very memorable. So, if you like WWII fiction with lovable and realistic MCs, definitely read this one!
This was an unexpected gem! I didn't especially love The Hate U Give, and yes, this one did have some scenes that I had to skip, but then there is MAVERICK, and he makes up for all of that. He is such a Soft Dad Boy and he needs time to just be a teenager, but he can't, because now he has a son, and he's trying to do the right thing, but it's not working... I. Love. This. Kid. Also, I loved the way Thomas uses AAE (African American English), because I heard a TON of that in summer of 2019 when I was working with people who spoke it, and it was all familiar and nostalgic and stuff.
My full review is HERE.
This was a very enjoyable steampunk romp through an alternate Revolutionary War-era American Colonies, with memorable characters (especially Athen. I LOVE Athen), interesting worldbuilding, and a rollicking plot! It wasn't the best MG book I've ever read (Greenglass House holds that distinction, if you're wondering), but it was enjoyable, and I would recommend it to young acquaintances.
I have developed a bit of a soft spot for books with ghosts (a soft spot that I never in a BILLION years would have predicted I would develop. Ha, look at me, learning and growing) as well as a soft spot for the Revolutionary war AND sassy, funny, ridiculous, ego-centric-but-sweet male characters (see: Eugenides. See: Howl), so this book hit all of the right notes! It just didn't stick with me as much as The Perilous Gard, by the same author, hence "Good" rather than "Better".
An MG novel with a Deaf protagonist, who's living in Martha's Vineyard back when Martha's Vineyard was a community of people who used Sign. The author is Deaf, and I thought that brought a lot to the narrative style, especially in terms of her ability to describe things visually. However, it did suffer from some Middle-Grade-Fiction-itis (a little too preachy on the racial & (dis)abled conflicts, a bit of a weird plot structure). My full review is HERE.
This wasn't perhaps the best Dickens I've ever read (I'm in the middle of A Tale of Two Cities while I'm writing this post, which I anticipate going in 'Best', so that's maybe not entirely fair) but it's the one that I enjoyed most of the ones I'd read up till that point. It's full of so ridiculously many plot threads, but I was able to mostly keep them straight, AND I actually cared about the characters, which doesn't happen to me very often with Dickens. I am coming more and more to appreciate Dicken's ironic writing style, in which he makes full use of his vocabulary. Thanks to Sarah Seele for the recommendation!
This was a beautiful, albeit dark, fairytale, with a somewhat subtle but somewhat overt Christian allegory (depending on which part of the story one was in). Unfortunately (or fortunately?) I find myself somewhat in Tolkien's camp concerning allegory. It was beautiful, but I found myself irritated by the allegorical parts, especially when they seemed to be all over the place, which was fairly often. I did like it, it just wasn't amazing. I did really love Aethelbald's love for Una, though, of course. :)
This was shorter than I expected, and also encompassed far more than I expected. It did an excellent job of showing how it is absolutely true that "even the smallest person can change the course of the future"--or the course of someone's life. I LOVED Carlo, but I also loved the other characters, perhaps because Donellan does a laudable job of showing how to love those who seem prickly or "unlovable"... It's rare that I find a truly Catholic book, especially one that I can enjoy, so this was a highlight. It did have a bit of the self-published feel, but it was also the author's first book, so I cut her some slack for that.
This one was recommended by Sarah Seele, and she somehow knew that I am nostalgic for old VERY science-y sci-fi that is light on character development and heavy on idea development, and I am very confused about HOW she knew that, because that is not something that is obvious. Needless to say, this book fulfilled all of those things, so, while it is not a book for everyone, it was the book for me.
This was a good break from some more serious reading, with elves who can't usually talk to humans, and a pair of an elf and human who can most certainly talk to each other. One of the MCs is a huge protective teddy bear, and I LOVED that. I loved that very much. Also, the drinking scene was perhaps the funniest thing I read that month. It was not the best plotted book I've ever read, but still fun, and some of the vibes were a bit MWT-y, which I of course appreciated.
I happen to love Murderbot very much. Murderbot, with its denial of its emotions, its secret love and protectiveness for those who it technically has to protect, and use of media to distract itself from its emotions that it definitely does not have, reminded me a little too much of me [except, I "self-medicate" with books, not TV shows XD]. AND it was sci-fi. I always forget how much I love sci-fi until I read it. And then I forget again.
About racial relations in Little Rock during the Civil Rights Movement, and friendship between a white girl (Marlee) and a girl who is passing as white (Liz), and how that threatens to break things very badly. I really loved the MCs, especially how different they were, and yet how their friendship still worked, and how the parents were not shown as being all-knowing. Thanks to Chloe for the recommendation!
I love reading books about Jewish protagonists (it's a part of my heritage that I'm fascinated by), and if said books involve WWII, that makes me even happier. So, this seemed like it would be a good fit! And mostly, it was. The what-if that was the premise for the sci-fi part of the book seemed realistic, and the limitations that came with it were well-drawn. I'm not always as much of a fan of alternate history, but that didn't really bother me here. I was worried that the motorcycle race was going to be boring, but that definitely didn't happen! Overall, it was good, just not great.
Why is Lord Peter SO GOOD? Please answer me that. So ridiculously nonsensical but lovable all the same, and I DO love him, but in such a way that I shake my head over his ridiculousnesses. Like deciding that proposing to a woman who is on trial for murder is a good idea. Lord Peter, spoiler alert, that is never a good idea. The mystery was excellent, too, and if I remember correctly, this is the one where someone pretends to be a medium in order to elicit information, and THAT was really fun (and was later referenced in one of my classes this past semester, and having read it made me feel smart, and that's always a plus. XD).
This was such a weird one, BUT legitimately so fun. It's like an Alice in Wonderland that is actually logical! This is my kryptonite! It's halfway between The Girl Who Circumnavigated Fairyland In A Ship Of Her Own Making and Alice in Wonderland, and it references Zeno's Paradise and "Goodnight Irene" and "The Big Rock Candy Mountain", and all of these things should be enough recommendation for you to read it, just saying.
Like Percy Jackson meets Lockwood & Co., and I am over here just enjoying this wild ride! One of the things I loved most about this book was the trope of true names having power. I don't know why that idea fascinates me so much, but it really does, and it was used to great effect in the plot of this one. :)
The hype for this one was extreme, but I thought it mostly lived up to it! The settings were all well-drawn and easy to "see", and I thought the plot worked well, and the worldbuilding (especially the powers) was awesome! Scarlet got a TON of character development, which was great, but I didn't feel like any of the other characters got nearly as much development as I was expecting, especially from all the hype about Ares. But I will still read the next one when it comes out, I do believe.
I wasn't entirely sure what I was going to think of this Pride & Prejudice retelling--I've had both wonderful and horrible experiences with those--but this was one of the better executed ones I've read. The author really made the story and plot her own, while crafting believable and lovable characters who made sense both with the original and in the 'hood! I especially loved the sister relationships, something that can make or break a P&P retelling, particularly because the relationships in the original are so complicated.
I'm still thinking about this one occasionally, as is my wont with OSC books. Pretty much anything he's written, I will read and love. (Note: pretty much. I avoid the Gatefather series.) He just has a way with human minds, emotions, and actions that is unparalleled. I'm not sure how he manages it, but I want to be that good someday. Maybe. I'm not entirely sure I can get there. XD Anyway, this one is about a modern young man who stumbles into a fairy-tale (sort of) and ends up having many hilarious miscommunications with the princess of the fairy-tale as they pass back and forth between the fairy-tale world (that involves Russian & Eastern European fairy-tale tradition) and the present, trying to figure out how to save both "kingdoms" from ruin. The princess is SASSY as all get-out, and the MC is simply trying to figure out how to survive and get back, and it makes the best combination. There were a few suggestive bits, but all things considered, I would highly recommend it anyway.
What a strange and beautiful book. Piranesi has an element of mystery and beauty to it that is ephemeral and lovely. The imagery is fascinating and scintillating, and I wanted more and more. I could read Clarke describing strange and mysterious houses per omnia saecula saeculorum. And I LOVED Piranesi's point of view and his love of the house. <3 And there are so many Lewisian/Chestertonian/Tolkienian connections in it that I enjoyed spotting! But at the same time, it was a little too Barfieldian, too. I don't like Barfield's philosophy. And the end felt a little bit anticlimactic. But I still really liked it, it just had...certain flaws to it.
I was talking to my pastor about how irritating The Swiss Family Robinson is, because the family literally has everything that they need for life...and Father pointed me towards this book, in which they do not start out with everything they need for life. Of course, since it's a survival novel from that period, the character development was not the best, but it was still very enjoyable--for me, at least. Twenty-Thousand Leagues Under The Sea was one of my favorite books when I was small, and going back to Jules Verne, a new Jules Verne, was delightful. Also, I loved the tie-in at the end. That was perfection.
An unreliable narrator, three weird fae, and one gristly murder = an engaging story that's not the most well-developed thing I ever read but was still great fun, because fae. Fae who call humans "pet". And also tea. And the relationships that said fae develop with their pet human.
I had never thought that anyone would think to retell the story of Joseph from the Bible besides in musical form (which really didn't retell it as much as tell it), so this one took me by surprise--it's a gender-bent modern retelling of Joseph, which I didn't realize until I was almost finished with it. It's not afraid to delve deep into dark places (but not in an inappropriate manner), while still preserving hope.
Moonscript by H. S. J. Williams
I enjoyed this one, but I wasn't as much a fanatic fan of it as many other people who I've heard raving on its behalf, possibly because it felt quite a bit like a Protestant rip-off of The Lord of the Rings. But the characters were still engaging, and the battle between good and evil was believable. I especially liked the use of a different MC than a hobbit-y person, but who was still someone small and uncapable, but who still Did Good and Changed the Course of the Future.
Prairie Lotus by Linda Sue Park
For anyone who loved Laura Ingalls Wilder and wished that there were more wholesome (but not in a bad way) stories about frontier life, behold, Linda Sue Park has come through, with a half-Chinese MC who moves with her father to Dakota territory, I believe? It has many of the surroundings and trappings from the Laura books (one-room schoolhouses, boom towns (I think that's what they're called...), button boxes, &c) but also dives into the obviously involved racial tensions in an age-appropriate way for an MG reader. I did think that some of the racial stuff was a little heavy-handed, but my gauge of "a little heavy handed" is probably more sensitive than most peoples'. Thanks to Chloe for the recommendation!
I wasn't expecting great things of this book, but in terms of character and plot, it entirely exceeded my expectations! It was Epic without plagiarizing any other fantasy epic I've ever read, and had interesting worldbuilding, to boot. I especially loved Brom. I have a predilection to loving crusty mentors who know more than they're letting on. I will say, the writing was kind of clunky, especially at the beginning, but the author was nineteen when it was published, so that's not exactly surprising...
A uniquely narrated and strangely beautiful look at immigration, meant for middle-grade readers. I don't think I'd ever read a book written entirely in the second person, but it somehow worked seamlessly here. It was certainly the right choice for a book that's meant to put the reader in the shoes of the MC as she tries to adjust to a new homeland that's strange and different, while also learning to get along with the magical new house. Full review HERE.
Better
Miss Megan suggested I read this one, and it was one of those books that you don't know if you're going to love before you read it, don't know if you love it while you're reading it, and then REALLY love when you're done. I badly need to reread it. It just has the most beautiful strands of grace twining through the incredible brokenness of the characters' lives. And the most wonderfully broken and strangely compelling characters, too. Especially Cordelia. I love Cordelia.
This book gave me Howl's Moving Castle/Castle in the Air mixed with Tuesday at the Castle vibes, and since I love all of those books, one might infer that I really enjoyed this one, too. Which I did. One might also infer that there is a castle, which there is, but there's so much more than that--a cat, a stubborn girl, a strange character in the castle, and a magical-ish pencil. Or something. *wiggles eyebrows* Full review HERE.
The Great Divorce by C. S. Lewis
I happen to have written my final senior paper on this book (along with Dante's Divine Comedy), which maybe makes me a little biased, but that's okay, because I think that even unbiased people would agree that this is an excellent book, flawed concept of purgatory notwithstanding. Lewis has a knack for understanding human nature and human sin, which he displays ostentatiously in Screwtape Letters, and more subtly (and, for me, more accessibly (I get freaked out by Screwtape)) in this one. And it's kind of convicting. There's a lot packed into a very short book.
There is a lot here packed into a very long book. Surprisingly, I enjoyed almost every minute of this one. The section on Waterloo, not so much, but I even enjoyed the parts that talked about the bishop (I LOVE the bishop), the cloister, and the sewer system. In fact, the parts about the sewer system were INCREDIBLY interesting, because guys, Hugo has a point. Paris was (quite literally) flushing nutrients down the toilet. So are we, in modern cities. But hey, we're not here to talk about humanure, so probably I should get on to the actual characters and plot. I already knew most of the story from watching Les Mis, and actually, going through, I was increasingly impressed by how well Les Mis did in adapting the original. There were some things that surprised me, though--like how little I liked Eponine (and how poorly he wrote all the female characters, honestly), but also how impressively well Hugo can convey the conflicted agonies of a soul trying to make the right decision. And how widely epic the entire story is, encompassing the lives and journeys of so many.
Georgette Heyer is hilarious. Also, Felix is JUST LIKE GANDALF, and it's a little bit strange. (Anyone who knows me in real life will know WHY it's a little bit strange, or even MORE than a little bit strange.) But anyways, I LOVE Alberstoke, and I LOVE the Merryvilles, and I DOUBLE LOVE the relationship between them, and the hijinks that ensue. I finished this book in the spring, and I still think about it on a fairly regular basis.
I don't really know how to sum this one up, except that it was incredible and Just In My Taste, with its fae strangenesses and mysterious castle and MCs who are stubborn and clueless (kind of like me...) and magic and the bone-chilling ending. It was simply amazing. Full review HERE.
GARY D. SCHMIDT, WHO GAVE YOU PERMISSION TO BREAK MY HEART LIKE THAT?
That is all.
WWI fiction with Greek gods worked in as narrators and characters dealing with complex issues at the same time as just trying to stay alive, and maybe falling in love in a very sweet and clean way? YES. I hadn't thought about this book in a while before writing this post, and now that I'm reminded of it, I remember how much I LOVED it. Especially some of the stuff that happens near/at the end. ;) Full review HERE.
Twelve Dancing Princesses retellings are my favorite retellings (as we've established, I believe, at one point or another), and this one certainly did not disappoint, what with a mysterious dance, a unique magical system, and a distinct lack of allegory (thank you, AES!). The main character was so VERY relatable, and the story took several extraordinarily unexpected turns, and I enjoyed every second. (In fact, I may need a reread...) Full review HERE.
I was not expecting this to be quite so...I don't know, unique, thought-provoking, real? The feel reminded me of several authors I enjoy--E. Nesbit, Hilary McKay, Elizabeth Marie Pope, and honestly Elizabeth Goudge and Madeleine L'Engle, to a point--with complicated relationships and a young girl MC who thinks deeply about life, but who also isn't afraid to laugh. Oh, and it's set in an abandoned castle, which was one of the more vivid settings I can remember reading this year.
GAK. I am not entirely sure how this book works, but it does, and we love it for it. If there are character-driven books and plot-driven books, this is a setting-driven book, which doesn't sound like it would be interesting, but it is. It's interesting and magical and real, and I WANT TO GO TO THE NIGHT CIRCUS. But just because it's setting-driven doesn't mean that there weren't good characters. Because there were. And the complexity of the characters certainly added quite a bit, but even they were wound up in the setting-driven-ness of the story, which sounds strange, but really isn't, I promise. I will say, there were some scenes that I wish there weren't, but the whole thing was so amazing that it's hard to hold those against the book.
Free verse novels are one of my weaknesses, and this one was one of the better ones I've ever read. Timothy has Done Something, and so he has to keep a court-mandated journal in order to not be placed in Juvenile Detention at age twelve. But there's more to the story than just Timothy Doing Something--there's also his little brother Levi, who can't breathe quite right, and the neighbors, and his probation officer and counselor, and Marisol. Oh, and ASL. The ASL is pretty awesome.
This was a really deep-reaching story for a play that only took me a couple of hours to read, exploring a lot of philosophical topics in very little time, from father-son relationships to war, through the travails of one family, who have lost their son and brother. It's a masterpiece of a microcosm showing something with macro ramifications.
I don't usually go in for scary stories, but this one was just about my speed! With a Very British ghost-hunting outfit headed up by a Siegfried Farnon-esque teenager, incredible worldbuilding, and just the right balance of scary/mystery/character development, it definitely made me want to read more...after a respectable amount of time for the shivers to wear off. :)
This was probably the best Goose Girl retelling I've ever read, and I LOVED it. The MC's humility and grace in her place was wonderfully done, and the setting was so vivid! The way the story was worked into the plot while also being unique and fitting the setting was seamless (for the most part), and the love story is SO cute! <3
I'd watched the miniseries before I read the book, which was, in retrospect, perhaps not the best choice, but hey, at the time, I didn't know that I was going to want to read the book. (Also, the miniseries was very faithful. So.) The best way to describe this one is probably "Jane Austen, but more depressing", but also perhaps "Jane Austen, but with more philosophy", and those two descriptions more or less balance out, and so I liked it just about as much as Jane Austen. Which is saying something.
The part that I remember most vividly about this book is the part where the storyteller-ish personage takes the MC (Echo) to his tent with his wife and baby, and his wife gracefully allows him to go with her. That was really beautiful, and honestly, I think about it not-infrequently. But there's also so much more to the book--brokenness vs. wholeness, destiny, love, and a mysterious white wolf. It was a simultaneous retelling of East of the Sun, West of the Moon (another favorite) and Beauty and the Beast, and it did both well, which was quite impressive.
I listened to this one while driving cross-country with my mom to get to college, and so I will never not remember watching the changing landscape out the window as Aerin goes through her various trials in her efforts to figure out what her destiny is. More or less. It's complicated. XD It's a beautiful kind of complicated, though. The only thing I didn't like was the romance, which was just weird, but the rest was wonderful, and a good choice for a road trip.
This felt rather like Orson Scott Card, which is perhaps the greatest compliment I can possibly give to a sci-fi novel. What I mean by that is that the author understands human nature (not quite as well as OSC, but nearly) and brought that to bear in the book, and so the characters work in a way that they don't always in sci-fi, if we're being honest. They weren't developed quite as much as I'd like (which, in an Orson Scott Card-esque book, is a high bar), but one can't have everything. The political intrigue felt realistic, and the desert planet was an intriguing and strange setting that I enjoyed reading about.
I grew up reading Calvin & Hobbes at my cousins' house, so when I heard about a Calvin & Hobbes-inspired book dealing with schizophrenia, I was both intrigued and also a little bit worried. Would it ruin the original comics for me? Would it be too strange? Would it make me paranoid? No, no, and no. In fact, it was amazing. I loved the characters, especially Susie, and their journey and the growth they went through, which was quite simply beautiful. If anything, it was too short...
Greenglass House is quite possibly my favorite MG novel of ever, and when I found out that there was a third book in the series that I didn't know about, I was both excited and also quite worried. But Milford has lost none of the magic that made the first two Greenglass books so wonderful. This one focuses on Marzana, a minor character from Ghosts, and her own adventures within The Liberty, when some unexpected events make her dig deeper, reach out, and perhaps discover that her life isn't as boring as she thought, after all. The Squad Energy was strong with this book, as were the mystery, twists, and family themes! (I'm not doing it justice. I'm a little tired today. XD)
I read this one after The Samurai, which is the order I would recommend for anyone who wants to read Endo, just so that you can be convinced that yes, he actually was Catholic, and this book isn't a representation of his beliefs, necessarily. That may allow one to look beyond the MC's actions to what the author actually thought...always an interesting thing to glimpse, especially through tiny scriptural references. I know a lot of people really hated the ending--and I did, too, mostly because I LOVED Father Sebastian, and it Wasn't Fair, but with the view of maybe-the-author-is-separate-from-the-MC, one can perhaps see a different view, and get the correct thing out of it. Maybe. It's a puzzling and troubling book, for certain.
I'm glad I waited to read this one until I was a little older, even though it's technically middle grade, not because I wouldn't have understood it, but because it would have scared me. So, that disclaimer aside--WOW. This book was so...cohesive. I'm not sure how else to explain it. The story-telling theme, the scary part, and the what-do-you-care-about, along with the characters, were knit together in a way that made it clear that the author spent a ton of time and care "weaving in the ends", to continue the knitting metaphor. I became attached to all the characters, and the whole story felt like a fairy-tale that couldn't have happened any other way. Jonathan Auxier--kudos.
This is quite possibly the best independently published book I've ever read. The pacing, plot, characters, and theme were all excellent, and although I guessed one twist towards the beginning, I didn't guess the one in the middle, and I have a hunch that the reader was meant to guess the first twist and so be drawn off from the second, which gives me an even higher opinion of Barber's storytelling abilities. I am, as I have probably made clear at this point, a sucker for good sci-fi, but very meh about poor and mediocre sci-fi, and this one falls in the category of good sci-fi, to my great satisfaction and happiness.
This is a book of actual letters written by the author to an independent bookstore in Britain...during WWII, I believe? And it was simple and brief, but I LOVED it. There were many things that reminded me both of myself as a reader and of friends, and the MC's (well, the author's) personality shines through so quirkily that even if one is not A Reader and can't identify with her that way, they would still be a delight to read.
This Potok wasn't quite as good as The Chosen (which I'll be talking about in a moment), but it was still Potok, and thus, beautiful, mysterious, thought-provoking, and full of philosophy. Especially about art, what being an artist means, and the matrices and legacy of art. But really, I came and stayed for Asher, who is precociously wonderful and far too innocent for what he goes through.
Best
I was not particularly expecting to love this one as much as I did, especially considering that when my mom (whose taste in books I tend to trust) read it, she didn't even finish it. And also considering that almost everyone who I talked to about it complained about the huge number of nicknames, and the forty-minute monologues. But somehow, I never found a one of those ginormous and boring monologues (or at least, I never found them boring. Ha, see what I did there?), and the nicknames did not confuse me. Instead, I was fully sucked into this story about three (four) brothers trying to find the meaning of life and how to live it to the fullest. I (of course) loved Alyosha (who doesn't?) but Ivan really spoke to me as well, especially through "The Grand Inquisitor". I sort of think that I could all too easily fall into Ivan-ing, if I hadn't been brought up with knowledge of the truth, and that's very scary. So I have a lot of compassion for him! And the fact that Alysoha does, too, endears him to me even more.
This is probably my favorite compendium of Lewis's essays I've ever read, and that is quite the statement, given that there's another compendium of essays in the Best section for this year. But still, I stand by my initial statement. Because, I mean, his essay on The Inner Circle is in here, and THAT was amazing, and the titular essay was fantastic (on heaven), and all of the other essays, on topics from pacifism to democracy to culture and learning during war, were very thought-provoking, and I still think about the ideas that I picked up from reading it. (And I need to reread it. :))
Chesterton's biographies are forever phenomenal, and I really appreciated how this book gave me a better view on St. Francis as a whole, not as the kitschy and saccharine person often presented by too-pious biographies. I especially loved the meditation that St. Francis was the one who brought the love of creation back after men had fasted from it as a penance for the nature-worship of the ancient Greeks, Romans, &c. There were many other parts I loved, but that's the one that I think about most often.
This might be the most unique book I read all year, bar none. I mean--a sentient, possibly evil, mandatory school for young wizards? With mysterious libraries that are THE BEST? From the first scene, wherein our heroine attempts to not destroy the world while cleaning her room, to the last scene, wherein #spoilers, I was hooked on the world, on the MC, and on the turns of events. In addition, the MC, El (short for you-will-never-guess-what, I promise you) is one of the most hilarious (not on purpose, of course) AND most relatable (for me) character I've read in SO LONG. Her cluelessness in social situations, and her crustiness about how she will do it HERSELF, and her sarcasm, and how much she scares people...okay, maybe I'm not quite that cool, but I DEFINITELY saw myself in her. Which doesn't happen all that often. Full review HERE.
One of my new favorite books of 2021, discovered at Miss Megan's recommendation! (Although it's one my mom loves, too.) A librarian moves to a small town to keep a small private library, and finds herself let in for a whole lot more than she bargained for. And there's PHILOSOPHY. And SUBTLETY. And CHESTERTON. It wouldn't be everyone's cup of tea (case in point: Goodreads), but it was certainly mine. Full review HERE.
Another collection of Lewis essays, and while I didn't love this one quite as much as The Weight of Glory, it was still marvelous, especially the parts where he talked about children vs. adults and story, literary criticism, and different types of sci-fi/fantasy. Also, I will be forever grateful to Walter Hooper for also including Lewis's review of LOTR (I love Walter Hooper. In a totally non-weird way, I promise).
Another one discovered at Miss Megan's recommendation (just fyi, I'm not keeping track of who recommended EVERY book on this list--many of them are from Chloe, several from The Temperamental Writer, &c, but the fact that Megan recommended many of the books in Best amuses me, and so I'm noting it) and immediately loved and adopted. THESE BOYS. I LOVE THEM. This was incredibly well-written, using the subtlety that is the mark of an excellent writer, with less being more and things being left for the reader to figure out. I love all of the characters, especially my dear Danny, and their journeys. Even more impressively, I love the parts where they're debating Talmud. Those might have been my favorite parts, and I'm not entirely sure how Potok did that. Full review HERE.
Another Megan recommendation! I love many of Lord Tennyson's short poems, but I'd always found the long ones intimidating (I always forget my soft spot for epic poems while I'm not reading one XD), until Megan mentioned that Idylls had redemption for Guinivere and Lancelot, and could I resist that? No. Was it just as good as I expected? No...it was better.
Was this one quite as good as Code Name Verity? No. But was it still amazing and did I still LOVE it? Yes. Because JAMIE. If that isn't enough of a recommendation, a certain spoilery character ALSO happens to be in it, AND most of the new characters were lovable as well! And it re-introduced several of the themes from Code Name Verity, and I'm not tearing up, you're tearing up. Full review HERE.
This was the first "adult" Goudge I'd ever read, and it came at just the right time with the quiet fortitude of Lucilla, the rightness she encourages (and forces), the refuge of Damerosehay, and the beauty of the writing style. Oh, and the correct depiction of love, which was AMAZING.
My mom has been recommending this book to (read: shoving this book on) everyone she knows for a Very Long Time, and she FINALLY deemed me old enough to read it, which was a great relief (and joy) because I was starting to think that she was never going to think I was old enough! It was a most beautiful journey through the religious life right on the cusp of Vatican II, and the day-to-day lives of the nuns, and when I say it like that, it sounds boring, but it is not. It's beautiful. Especially the sensory and seasonal details, which permeate the whole thing and give it an unforgettable atmosphere. Also, no one writes like Rumer Godden, in the best possible way--she has a very unique style that is probably not for everyone, but which I love dearly.
I happened to finish this particular book while our pastor (a HUGE Chesterton fan) was over, and that made it so much better than it would have been if I tried to appreciate it on my own! So, disclaimer: an awesome Dominican may be required to understand all of the nuance. And a Dominican is almost certainly required to find the Easter Egg that Chesterton leaves for Dominicans. ;) Anywho, this is, like most of Chesterton's fiction, wild and wacky, but incredibly insightful and beautiful in its own way. Especially at the end, when it explores the problem of suffering, but in a very subtle way.
I read this book on the same day as The Man Who Was Thursday, and lemme just say, that was an EXCELLENT reading day. This book kept me glued to the couch until it was done, "being a good host" notwithstanding. The mystery was excellent, and the Oxford setting is My Favorite, and there was LATIN, and LORD PETER and also LORD SAINT-GEORGE and it was Just So Good.
This graduation gift may be the most thought-provoking book I've read this year, especially about issues of grace, forgiveness, humility/pride, love, and what following God really means. It's about a "whisky priest" during the Cristero Wars, and it's told in a way reminiscent of Willa Cather and Flannery O'Connor's writing. The whisky priest is MY SON and I LOVE HIM TOO MUCH, and THAT ENDING, I CAN'T DEAL WITH IT. Full review HERE.
Can I be Holly Ordway when I grow up? Please? How do I get that job?? (I know, I know--lots more college, probably as an English major, and then I will not get paid very much. I don't think I'm going to do that, but IT'S TEMPTING.) She has spent so much time studying Tolkien and his reading and making exhaustive lists and studies (I sense a kindred spirit) and absolutely debunking Stupid Humphrey Carpenter's false view of Tolkien that he proposed in his Stupid biography. (I dislike Carpenter even more after reading this book, to the point that I went and yelled about it to my friends in the caf for probably two minutes straight while I was reading it). I loved hearing more about Tolkien's taste, especially where it lined up with mine/things I had read--for instance, he read The Borrowers! I LOVED The Borrowers! It was certainly a very academic book, but since I like those, that was no burden.
Tolkien, I just want to give you a Big Hug. (But you're dead, so I'm going to have to wait for Heaven, I guess.) The was so sweet and beautiful and allegorical in a way that I never through Tolkien would be, but it's perfectly done.
(I kind of want to write a paper comparing this to The Great Divorce, which is an idea that just occurred to me, but might actually get done. An essay, or maybe a blog post.) (That would require me reading both of them again, which would be no hardship.) (If you want me to do that...let me know in the comments! If I get enough
Chesterton obviously needs to be reread before it's completely understood, but even on my first readthrough of Everlasting Man, I loved it. There's just so much. I could mine this book for philosophy possibly forever. I especially loved the parts where he talked about humans and art, the rational soul, and God/gods/demons/philosophers. Overall, it's about humanity before and after salvation (sort of. it's complicated) and the discussion of humans and human nature obviously fascinates Chesterton, and thus the reader also.) I need to read it again, and I also need my own copy.
A recommendation from the same person who gave me The Power and the Glory, and somehow, even though this book was very different, it also felt similar. Analogous, if you will. Or maybe opposite, if that makes any sense. And it's SO HARD to summarize. It's also about pride/humility, like TPatG, but also about God's will and how we do it, how God's grace works, the Sacraments, and so much more, especially about human nature. And the ending...<3 This one was simply Beautiful.
Another book that I'd heard my mom getting excited about a while ago, this one surprised me in so many ways! Firstly, in how well Backman can get into this crotchety old man's head. Secondly, how dark this crotchety old man's head is. Thirdly, how funny this book is, despite the darkness of the crotchety old man's head. Fourthly, how much I came to care about the crotchety old man, and his whole neighborhood...especially the Cat Nuisance.
I always, as I may have mentioned, forget how amazingly ironic Dickens is, until I start reading another of his books. Also, how fantastic his characterization is, even for side characters. (How is Madame Defarge so terrifying?) And how twisty his plots can be. I remember reading a child's version of this story as a kid, and I still didn't figure out some of the twists and turns of the plot. But the storytelling is not the only reason I loved this one so much. There were also Charles and Sydney, both of whom I love muchly for VERY different reasons. SYDNEY why do you have to be so amazing? And Charles, why do you have to be so sweet? You both have raised some bars. :)
It's always interesting to me how our tastes in books sometimes are very similar and sometimes are wildly different (for example, I can't stand Dickens *ducks and hides*). How cool is it that we all have different tastes and preferences in stories? I mean, how boring would this world be if we all liked exactly the same kinds of stories? (there certainly wouldn't be anywhere near as big a need for different authors, I guess).
ReplyDeleteAnyway, many of these I haven't read of course, seeing as how I tend to stay in the SFF realm with my reading. :)
But The Chosen by Chaim Potok is one of my all-time favorites. Such a beautiful story. And yes, oddly enough, the whole discussing Talmud thing is one of my favorite bits, as well, and that's impressive.
Heartless is everything a debut novel usually is. The rest of that series gets better and not as allegorical at all. I have weird opinions about the series, apparently, because I prefer Shadow Hand and Golden Daughter to the rest of the series, while I hear people raving about Dragon Witch (which... I didn't appreciate as much). *shrug*
Yes, A Branch of Silver, A Branch of Gold was lovely.
Eragon is a straight-up rip off of Star Wars with some Lord of the Rings thrown in for good measure. sorrynotsorry :-D :-D
I really really need to read Echo North. I even have the lovely hardcover version sitting on my shelf, where it's been for almost 2 years now. *ducks* It's really ridiculous how difficult my TBR has become to get through lately. Ah well.
I also picked up a free copy of North and South from my library give-away, but if it's more depressing than Austen, I might put it off... I love the mini-series and have heard it is quite faithful to the book, but for some reason I'm having a hard time making myself pick it up. hmmm.
Thanks for posting about your favorite reads! It was fun to read! :)
Merry Christmas!
It is interesting! You're right, though--it's good that we're different! If we were all the same in our taste in books, in addition to the boringness and lack of need for authors, it would take all the fun out of recommending books! (I can understand how you can dislike Dickens. I imagine he's not for everyone. Heck, he's not for me a lot of the time. I can only enjoy a Dickens book twice a year or so. XD)
DeleteOh, you love The Chosen, too? Lovely! (And from what I've heard, you love the TV series, too...it amuses me that both the book and the adaptation of the life of Christ have the same name, especially since they're so different but many people like both.) I'm glad that loving the Talmud discussions isn't just a crazy me-thing!
Okay, that is a good point. I don't think I've read a whole lot of debut novels (or at least, the debut novels I have read have been good enough that I haven't noticed a lot of debut novel syndrome), but that explanation makes a lot of sense. I think I am planning on reading some of the other books in the series, so I'm not going to write the books off forever.
It really was!
Okay, I didn't think of Star Wars. That I could maybe admit. But honestly, a fantasy retelling of Star Wars is not the worst thing that's ever happened to the YA Fantasy market. XD
Oh, Jenelle, I think you will LOVE Echo North! Definitely read it! (But I totally understand about the TBR thing. Mine is also astronomical.)
If depressing books get you down, then yes, you might want to put it off. The miniseries is quite faithful to the book in many ways, but I don't remember it as being quite as depressing. So...take that as you will. XD
You're welcome! I'm so glad you enjoyed reading it!
Merry Christmas to you as well! And have a very happy New Year!
I’m not kidding, I literally woke up with this thought: I wonder if A Riddle in Ruby will be on Sam’s Good, Better, Best list for the year. XD Why that one out of all the other books on this list I’ve read, I have no idea. XD But anyway, it was! :D
ReplyDeleteI’ve read 8 and a half of these, out of, how many are there? It is a massive amount. And we’re not even going to talk about the impossibility of 300 books in a year. My goal (and I’m only two books away! XD) was 30, so one tenth of your accomplishments. Bravo. XD (Half because I started Pride but didn’t finish it because I had to leave the bookstore…) (And we pretty much have the same thoughts, except for Dune. XD Are you planning on continuing the series? Have you seen the movie? It makes sense what you said about you liking your sci-fi light on character development and heavy on world building. I’m a bit of the opposite.)
Oh my goodness, the bishop is my favorite part of Les Mis, too. <3 I still haven’t read it, but I loved him especially in the Masterpiece series they did a while back.
Felix is just like Gandalf? XD Dude, the power of names, lol. ;) That is hilarious!
Asher is WAY too innocent for what he goes through! Ugh! The poor guy! I constantly just want to hug him. There’s a sequel, are you going to read that? I haven’t decided if I want to yet.
I haven’t read Idylls of the King (well, I haven’t read that much King Arthur so it’s not a surprise…) but Lancelot and Guinivere redemption has me fascinated. My sister and I are still watching Merlin (have one season left!) and I adore this show because it is so creative and I love how they weave ALL the elements in. I thought it was a particularly interesting way that they did those two characters. So, if you’re interested, there is that to check out… (plus the show is SO FUN, I laugh in every episode, I cry every few, and the characters are the most precious I have come across in a long time. I also do a lot of screaming, which my sister is getting tired of. XD)
Do the Leaf By Niggle and The Great Divorce post! Do it! Do it! Do it! I haven’t read either, but that would convince me to read both…I might read both in preparation for that post. XD
I was getting worried that I hadn’t read a single book in the Best section, but ATOTC saved me, so we’re okay. ;)
Now I want to read these…I’m especially interested in Rat Rule 79 (say what now? XD), Enchantment, Calculated, and House Arrest. Usually at this time of the year I’m trying to read as many books as I possibly can, but this year I’m just going to try to finish up two and then take my time with everything, so I’m looking forward to it. As soon as 2022 starts I’ll get back into my mad dash reading which has been dormant since August. ;) I want to finish the Shadow and Bone series and ready my sister’s recommendation of Everything Everything by Nicola Yoon, but after that I don’t have plans. Maybe one of these… What are YOUR reading plans for the new year? ;)
I'm honestly more impressed that you predicted that I would *do* a GBB year list and that I would post it when I did than that you predicted ARiR! I did consider not doing it at all this year, but I decided that that would be No Fun and Very Boring, so even though it took FOREVER, I put it together!
DeleteHey, 8.5 is not an insignificant amount out of all of these! (The thing is, reading is my hobby and perhaps my exclusive hobby, AND I am driven by a Hamilton-esque feeling of running out of time, so those two things combine to make me read like a maniac...and I'm naturally a fast reader anyway. XD)
I've heard (from my dad) that the rest of the Dune books are horrible, so I am not going to read them! But I do plan on watching the movie, as soon as I can. To be fair, I LOVE sci-fi that's heavy on character development (like Orson Scott Card), but I have a soft-spot for the heavy on worldbuilding kind, too.
The bishop is SO LOVELY! (What's the Masterpiece series? I've never heard of it.)
I know, it's too funny! I was greatly diverted while reading and listening to it.
I knooooooow he just needs hugs and possibly to get away from that art teacher, lol. I don't know how I feel about the art teacher. I had no idea there was a sequel, but I'm sort of tempted to read it, especially after the cliffhangeresque ending!
The Lancelot and Guinivere redemption was what hooked me into it, too! Ooh, I've heard of Merlin, but not from someone whose recommendation I trust, so...I am intrigued. We'll see what happens.
Okay, it's now on my list of posts to write someday! I'll see if I can find time... (both of them are really short! Leaf by Niggle is really only a short story! You should read them!)
Haha, saved by the most recently read book on the list! XD
Oh, I think you would really enjoy all of those--Rat Rule 79 and House Arrest especially. Both of those are quick reads, also! It's so nice when one can just take time with reading. I totally got a chance to do that this past week, and it's reawakened my rabid reading appetite once again--although whether that's a good or bad thing, I'm not quite sure! XD Your dad recommended Everything Everything? Interesting. I'm curious what you end up thinking of those.
My reading plans are still in the works, but I have some ideas:
-Get off Goodreads for most things, record books read (and thoughts) and TBR on paper
-I'm thinking about giving each month a theme, so that I can read books in context (themes like "saints" or "THE British authors (Lewis, Chesterton, Tolkien), "British authors", "modern Catholic authors", etc.), but I'm not sure about that yet.
Wow, was this only 10% or less of the books that you read this year? (I'm too funny.)
ReplyDelete*Squeals* The Hero and the Crown was amazing!!! You have to read the sequel as well, which is maybe better. (The Blue Sword.) And the sword, which I forget its name, is also cool! (And I agree with the landscape thingies. 100%. I, however, did not listen to it in the car, but I do remember listening to it while I was mowing. *sigh* the one drawback of summer, mowing in 100+ degree weather.)
Night circus was a little weird. (I only listened to a small amount of it.) Not sure I want to finish it, though. (I have no interest in anybody in the book. Especially not the boy, because he struck me as a prig.)
And Thief Knot. I still haven't finished it XD! I started it about a year ago!! (I'm not even halfway through, I think. Ya know, just forget it.)
mmmmmm I really want to read Deadly Education... maybe soon. I'll see. (My fam loves it though ;) )
nnnnnng trying to think of a book suggestion I would guess you would not have read already, but no! That is literally impossible for me. eheh, help, please. Maybe it's me needing the suggestions.
Faramir
P.S. Have a nice holiday at home. With your lovely family, of course. (And I'm too used to my bros and it seems normal to have them at home, so... it's not novelty anymore? (it isn't the same as your family having you go to college for the first time.))
Oh, it wasn't 10%. It was only 20%.
Delete(Also, the cover of Eragon that you chose is weirding me out. Ughhhhhhhhhhh...)
Faramir
I think you're right, it's about 20%. Not bad, really.
DeleteIt was a really good book! I'm not sure how I feel about the sequel, but we'll have to see. It's so interesting how one really does remember what one was doing while listening to books very well. (Mowing in 100+ degree weather sounds awful, though.)
I don't think Night Circus is the book for you quite yet, m'dear.
I think you should finish Thief Knot! It was good! And you *might* like A Deadly Education, but I'm not quite sure.
If you really need suggestions, I could give you some...;)
Thank you! I'm definitely enjoying spending time with my family!
Suggestions would be wonderful. Thank you.
Delete(I will tell you if I've already read any of them.)
Faramir
Ok, I will email you!
DeleteSuper blog
ReplyDeleteThank you.
DeleteI love this post so much!! Esp. because there are some overlaps between my readings and I get to read about books that will def. go on my TBR list (which is ad infinitum)
ReplyDeleteWhich reminds me, I need to read more Chesterton...
I loved The Great Divorce, I Capture the Castle (read this year), A Deadly Education (also this year), and The Brothers Karamazov (my second fav. Dostoyevsky read) as well. I'm glad you enjoyed reading them, too!!
And Endo Shusaku. I think you're the first person here that's mentioned such a traditional Japanese author! (Which also reminds me a lot of his books are still lying unread in my kindle...)
I hope you have a wonderful New Year!!
Thank you!! It's cool that there are some overlaps, and I hope I didn't balloon your TBR by too much...
DeleteYou do definitely need to read more Chesterton, though. I would personally recommend starting either with Orthodoxy, The Ball and the Cross, or the Father Brown mysteries. :)
Oh yay, those are all such good ones! Now I'm curious...what's your favorite Dostoyevsky?
He's such a wonderful author, even in translation! I really appreciated everything I read by him.
You as well, S. J.!
Ack, so many good books! I just reread 84, Charing Cross Road last year, and it's so sweet and FUN. It's so bookish, and I love it. I've been meaning to read Lovely War and I Capture the Castle since I read your review/mini-review respectively (I think) and I...have not read either of them. But I do intend to! I'm just going to have to wade through the rest of my TBR to get to them...
ReplyDeleteCan we just take a moment to think about Timothy Davidson and how wonderful he is?
So my mom was reading A Man Called Ove and I was like, "meh." But then she was listening to an audiobook and I overheard two minutes of it and...it was interesting? I quite liked the writing style, and now you've reminded me that I want to read it :)
The love of books really shines through 84, Charing Cross Road, and it is so lovely! I totally understand the "yes, I'll read it...after wading through my TBR to it" feeling...I think there's at least one book you've recommended me that I still haven't gotten to, for that reason, but it will happen! XD
DeleteWe absolutely can. That boy needs all the love he can get.
Oh, you SHOULD read that one! The writing style is phenomenal, and I think you would love it.
I need to read Masque I am loving every Wr Gingwell book I've read. I'm on the last in the Between Cities Series and I don't know what I'll do when it's done. Love The Sherwood Ring and The Perilous Guard too.
ReplyDeleteWell, you need to read Masque, and I need to read the Between Cities Series, so I think we're on the same level, lol. Those two are so good!
DeleteNorth and South being described as "Jane Austen, but depressing/more philosophical" is exactly the wording I had in my head when I first saw it, too. ;)
ReplyDeleteI'm keen to read Dune - I just watched the film in cinemas earlier and now am very intrigued about the story overall. :D
Haha, I don't know why it's so accurate, but it's true!
DeleteIt's a very good book! And from what I've heard from my family, the movie did a good job being faithful to the book.
OK, here are a couple of suggestions that I thought of:
ReplyDeleteStation Eleven. Seriously. It is an amazing book and kept me pondering for months after. The writing is fabulous. It is a great book despite being post-apocalyptic because of a pandemic though. Keep that in mind in this day and age.
You read A Gentleman in Moscow, right? If not, do it!
The Reed of God by Caryll Houselander.
Thank you for your suggestions! I've added them to my list. (And I have read A Gentleman in Moscow. Of course! ;))
DeleteThese posts are great, as you know. ALSO I got to the end and read your first question and laughed. NEVER FEAR, SAM, I KEPT STATS. So, I've read 23 of these (18 I either liked or loved, 5 I disliked), started-but-not-finished 5 (3 because I was bored, 2 because I didn't like the prose), and I actively-and-very-much-so want to read 12 of them. Fun.
ReplyDeleteOh, I love the scene in Mont Saint-Michel (in Assignment in Brittany) TOO. It's so...something? I don't know? But I love it?
Hehe. I knew you'd like Badge of Infamy. (Well, very much thought so.) So pleased you did.
I get much more freaked out by The Great Divorce than by Screwtape...interesting. What is it about Screwtape that freaks you out, exactly? (And what's the flawed concept of Purgatory in The Great Divorce? I don't even remember them talking about purgatory at all in that book, WEIRD.)
I still need ghost-hunting Siegfried in my life so badly. MUST GET TO The Screaming Staircase.
The Hero and the Crown is so beautifully written, isn't it? I overall dislike the book because I just hate the ending that much (and I read this book when I was...thirteen or so, and I still have strong feelings about the "romance" (it does not deserve to be referred to thusly without air quotes), because I HATED IT SO MUCH), but seven-eighths of it at least is gorgeous. It was one of those books I simply could not stop reading. Robin McKinley's writing is just...addictive. It makes me happy that you enjoyed it. :)
Re: The Man Who Was Thursday, I do believe Chesterton is the only person who can say something like "we just don't understand how it all works and there are things, even things that seem awful to us, we have to take on faith" and I'm like "huh yeah you have a point." I don't know how or why he makes the idea of not knowing acceptable to me, but he really does.
THE EVERLASTING MAN IS MY FAVORITE CHESTERTON. SUCH GOODNESS. SUCH PROFUNDITY. SUCH CLEVERNESS. SUCH POETRY. (none of which is Chesterton, Chesterton is just shewing it forth, as it lies in history, with unusual clarity) AHHHHH I LOVE
I'm glad you enjoy them! I always get nervous when I publish one this long... OF COURSE you kept stats, would I expect anything less? 23, amazing! Curious now...which ones did you dislike and dnf? And which ones are you looking forward to reading?
DeleteIt's just got a certain je ne sais quos, to rip off the setting for its language, that makes it memorable. So good!
I'm still impressed by your bookish intuition where that book is concerned.
Weird! Hm, people are different, what a surprise. ;) I am very sensitive to the flipping of the morality in the writing of the letters, for whatever reason, especially the referring to God as the enemy. I KNOW that it's from the wrong perspective, and it still bothers me. I'm not sure why.
The flawed concept of Purgatory comes when Lewis says at one point that for those who make it to heaven, hell will have been Purgatory. And that's just...not accurate at all! And I know that coming out of hell is a plot device, but it's still a very inaccurate plot device.
If it helps at all, The Screaming Staircase isn't very long...
The ending and "romance" (which can indeed only be referred to with air quotes) did kind of ruin the book for me. Buuuut the beauty of the rest of the book does go a long way towards making up for that, because the writing is indeed lovely, and so is the story.
I think you're absolutely right! I think it might be because he actually LOVES that unknowability? He's very in love with the concept of mystery, both mysteries that we can solve (see: Father Brown) and those that we can't understand (see: Christianity) and also paradox, and it shows through his writing, in the way that anyone being passionate about anything can light us on fire with enthusiasm. Does that make sense? I might be wrong, but I think that's at least part of it.
IT'S SO GOOD!!! I don't think that it's my *favorite* Chesterton, but it is indubitably up there. (Then again, all of his work is "up there", so do I even have favorites? I don't know.) (And I must take exception to your statement that none of it is Chesterton. At least SOME of the cleverness and poetry is Chesterton. XD)
Disliked: Brideshead Revisited, Hero and the Crown (as discussed- the ending poisoned it for me), Awakening of Miss Prim, Gaudy Night, and Leaf by Niggle (the poetic justice of an allegory-hater's allegory being hated, haha). Kinda funny that they're all in Better or Best. xD Must not just have differences of opinion, must have STRONG differences of opinion.
DeleteDNF: The Hunchback of Notre Dame (as a little kid; I suffered through the boring boring self-absorbed playwright for so long but when it turned into a chapters-long description of the layout of Paris I just couldn't take it any more), Piranesi (I want to try this one again though, I just wasn't in the mood and I didn't get very far), Echo North, the Jonathan Auxier book, and Idylls of the King (again, I mean to get through this one, I just am easily bored by blank verse).
Want to read: Concrete Rose, A Riddle in Ruby, Les Mis, Branch-of-Silver-Branch-of-Gold, The Screaming Staircase (of course), Thorn, North & South, Dune, 84 Charing Cross Road (I read part of a book - and intend to finish it someday - one time by a code-making guy in WW2 whose father was the actual bookshop owner in that book!), The Brothers Karamazov (I LOVE Dostoyevsky), Saint Francis of Assisi (I actually wanna get this for my mom, I've had a hard time getting her into Chesterton but she loves Saint Francis so it might do the trick), and The Chosen.
Whew. *wipes brow* That was long, but you did ask... XD
So, I never thought about it till you mentioned it, but the flipping of the morality bothering you makes a LOT of sense. A whole lot of sense.
I think the reason I like it more (since they're both equally astute indictments of human nature) is that it has a happy ending and is quite grounded and is so beautiful and hopeful and BEAUTIFUL at the end. Whereas The Great Divorce is just another level of weird, and not as universally hopeful, and the depiction of Hell absolutely appalls me (which I guess Hell should, but still), and it's an exploration of an idea but not grounded in the real world or how we're aware that things actually work. So it's weirdly uncomfortable. Through writing this paragraph I've decided that your reason for being uncomfortable with Screwtape is much better than mine for Divorce, haha.
I forgot about that line in The Great Divorce, but I remember it now, actually. I remember wondering if that was what Lewis actually believed. I was talking with a friend about the afterlife recently, actually, and how little we actually know about it, and how there's hints in the Bible that it's a bit more complicated than people usually present it. And we were also talking about Purgatory and how we don't think the Catholic concept of how it works seems Biblical, but we could definitely see it being a thing in some fashion? There's a certain logic to it.
Extra Chesterton thoughts lol:
DeleteThat's a good thought, that he takes joy in the unknowability. Somewhat related to his metaphor in Orthodoxy about getting one's head into the heavens vs getting the heavens into one's head (and one's head splitting as a consequence). And the thing at the end of Man Who Was Thursday, where he says something about how he can forgive God everything except His peace. But then he realizes that for all he knows things have to be the way they are or the extremely wonderful beautiful parts would be different and we just don't /know/. I think Chesterton wrestles with the agony of not knowing through to the joy of not knowing (as you said), and so it doesn't ring hollow as it might coming from someone else. It's a deeper sort of not knowing you get from trying to know, and realizing the reasons under why you can't.
(Oh, I meant that as a compliment to Chesterton, though, granted it did not sound like one. XD Something I've been thinking about recently is how important good writing is in nonfiction as well as fiction, especially nonfiction that's not just a straight facts-driven proposition like science or certain types of history books. Books that mix topics like history, theology, and philosophy, like The Everlasting Man. Because it's the author's job to /not get in the way/ of what he's communicating, yet to communicate it clearly and make us see it the way he saw it. To dazzle us with the incredibleness of what he's talking about, rather than accidentally obscuring it and just dazzling us with the incredibleness of his own writing abilities instead. And I've observed that authors have a LOT of trouble with that. And Chesterton makes it look easy, which means he's an even better writer than he appears on the face of it, imho. XD)
Oh yes, I LOVE that metaphor. For him, it's enough to see the unknowable thing and know that it's beautiful, without having to split one's head. Yes, I remember that part of Man Who Was Thursday being really good. What you're saying reminds me of when Aslan says, in Narnia, "you are never told what would have happened." We don't know what could or would be...we only know what Is. It can never be said of Chesterton that he does things by halves, or that he didn't wrestle with the issues! XD
Delete(Okay, I see what you mean. He does do an excellent job of not getting in the way of his own points but also showing us his *point of view*, and it's something that I'm probably not very good at, but he is incredible at. XD)
Ack, I answered these in the wrong order because Blogger didn't tell me I needed to approve the top comment until after I answered the bottom one. *facepalm*
DeleteI can understand you disliking Gaudy Night, but I don't think I can forgive you for Miss Prim or Leaf by Niggle. XD (Just kidding. I can absolutely look past differences of opinion, I'm just a tad appalled.)
If I had been allowed to DNF Hunchback, I probably would have, too, but I'm glad I pushed through. And I did skip quite a bit of the Paris chapter(s). XD
That is an excellent list of the ones you want to read. I approve entirely. And I think your mom would like the Chesterton St. Francis, if she likes St. Francis in general! (I have only just realized how this might be a little strange: if it's not rude, may I ask, how your mom, who I assume isn't Catholic, ended up loving a Catholic saint? I'm just curious. ;))
I do absolutely LOVE the ending of Screwtape, it just messes with (or "screws with", haha, I'm hilarious) my mental morality map, and I Don't Like It. I do think that Hell should be appalling, and I really like how bad Lewis makes it, actually. I can see your objection of it not being how we're away that things actually work...I think I might be a little more comfortable with this, just because of having read The Divine Comedy right before? Medieval literature didn't have a problem with descriptions of heaven that are obviously not quite like what it'll really be like, but serve another sort of purpose, and I think Lewis inherits that.
I'd be curious to know more about Lewis's views on Purgatory; I do know that he believed in it, but I don't know a lot about *what* he believed in. I know the very basics of Purgatory, but I'm afraid I don't know a whole lot about the Biblical precedents yet (I know some, but maybe not enough to do an entire explanation) but I'd recommend that you search up 'purgatory in the Bible' on Catholic Answers...they have some good articles considering various Biblical precedents, and also explaining what we actually believe about Purgatory. So. Anyway, you can feel free to disregard that whole thing if you want. XD
I LOVE THE PART WHERE ASLAN SAYS THAT. I didn't realize how much until recently (in a conversation with Megan about the morality of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, actually...). It's weirdly comforting and very Biblical (kind of...an unusual angle on the sovereignty of God, almost?) and the opposite of horrible multiverse nonsense that I hate. XD
DeleteHaha, does it soften Miss Prim if I say that my dislike is mild? And that I had very mixed feelings when I first read it, and it's just that the negative ones have persisted more strongly for some reason? I actually intend to reread it one of these days and think about it all a bit more. And as for Leaf by Niggle, it really isn't that I think it's bad as a story or an allegory, it's just that it IS an allegory. And like Tolkien, I really do just...strongly dislike allegory. And have done so since I grew old and wary enough to detect its presence. XD
It's not rude at all! Well, so first of all, I don't think she (or I) really thinks of him as exclusively a Catholic saint? Because he lived (and was canonized) in the thirteenth (I think) century, she and I just kind of think of him as belonging to all of Christendom. All saints do, I guess, but the further back you go toward the New Testament, the more so. And secondly, I remember learning about him in fourth grade, when we did medieval history for school (we had a lot of fun with ancient and medieval history, read a lot of things, took our time), and I think that's when my mom fell in love?
Screws with, haha. :P
Also, thanks for the recommendation!! Purgatory is in fact one of the beliefs that differs between denominations that I want to learn more about, so I'm really glad to know of a place to learn what Catholics believe about it (and Biblical precedents, which is probably the thing I'm most interested in), although I'll probably look into, like, transubstantiation first? That's the one that I'm really curious about (and not sure of my own beliefs about) at the moment.
I KNOW. I think about it ALL THE TIME! And it is the opposite of the multiverse (which I also odiate), and I love that very much. It's at the point where I get irritated when people talk about what might have happened if they did something else (i.e. my dad talking about what would've happened if he didn't meet my mom) because we can't know and we don't know and we'll probably never know, so it's very pointless. (But it can occasionally still be fun. Just as long as it's known to be pointless.)
DeleteThat does soften it, and I think you should reread it. (I gave it to a guy friend of mine for Christmas and he read and liked it, and I was both surprised and very, very happy. XD) Hm. I think I love Leaf by Niggle so much because it's about something so close to Tolkien that he can ONLY write about it as an allegory without hurting himself, but I don't know if that makes any sense. I can absolutely relate to your and his hatred of allegory, though. :)
(Well, to be fair, the only Christendom during his time was Catholic, but I digress...) That does make sense, though. Ancient and Medieval were absolutely the best parts of my historical education as well, and I appreciate that your mom learned and found new things/people to love while teaching you, as well! That's the best kind of teaching, I think. (This POV brought to you by Mortimer Adler.)
You're welcome! Catholic Answers is a pretty solid resource most of the time, and if you want something a little more official, the Catechism of the Catholic Church is the best reference resource I know of. (Or the Summa Theologiae, but that's a little more advanced. XD) I would be MORE THAN HAPPY to talk about transubstantiation with you, if you want! It's something I know a lot about, and also happen to love very much.
('Zackly, long as it's known to be pointless.)
DeleteI definitely shall. And I LOVE that view of why Tolkien wrote it as allegory; it makes perfect sense. And I'm glad he wrote something so lovely and helpful for so many people (including himself), despite my own personal inability to enjoy it. Tolkien is...such a dear, honestly??
(yeah, that's what I meant. If you and I both traced our spiritual ancestry back, we'd meet before we got to Saint Francis. So we're both equally "close" to him, the way I look at it, whereas with, say, Mother Theresa, you're closer to her than I am. Y'all are siblings; I'm more like cousins with her. But Saint Francis is both our great-grandpas. Okay, you know what I mean, hopefully. Even if you don't, I'd really better stop with these terrible metaphors. XD)
I would so, so love to talk about transubstantiation!! I have many questions!! Do you want to talk on this comment thread? It's gonna get buried in your old posts pretty soon...
Ah, I'm glad it made sense! It was just a vague notion of mine, a feeling that I got while reading it, but it made me want to hug him. :) Tolkien really is such a dear.
Delete(gotcha. Yes, we are spiritual cousins, sort of! XD)
AMAZING! I would love to see if I have many answers! XD I think it's probably a better idea for you to email me, if that works?